Showing posts with the label SARS-CoV-2

Africanews english Live

3 logical fact-based issues to consider before taking the COVID-19 vaccine

  While the media resorts to accusing people of being “anti-vaxxers,” for not  eager to  take a fast-tracked coronavirus vaccine,  and a few  have gone  thus far   on  even associate dissenters with being “anti-Semitic,” there  are literally  3 very logical fact-based reasons why  we must always  question  the protection  of a coronavirus vaccine. Multiple experts, including  people who  themselves actually administer vaccines, agree that fast-tracking a vaccine  may be  very dangerous. According to immunologist and deputy editor of the journal Science Advances, Dr. Douglas J. Green, fast-tracking a vaccine could potentially be “catastrophic”  and may  not be rushed. He cites an example from 1966,  during which  two children actually died from an adverse reaction to a vaccine. Two other historical examples that help  maybe  the potential danger of fast-tracking a vaccine,  is that the  Cutter incident from 1955  and therefore the  mandatory  flu  vaccination campaign from 1976. In 1955

World’s biggest Vaccine Maker Suing guy for pronouncing COVID-19 Vaccine Injured Him

It should have already been considered  a criminal offense  against humanity decades ago that law makers were lobbied (bribed) into passing legislation  within which  vaccine manufacturers  can not be  held legally  chargeable for  any damage their products may cause.  it absolutely was  an act which established official protocols,  like   the key  vaccine injury court to largely sweep under the rug any instances of such side effects. But now  a replacement  lawsuit filed by the world’s largest vaccine manufacturer Serum Institute of India, in association with multinational pharmaceutical giant AstraZeneca, seeks  to require  this a step further — by attempting  to line  the precedent that vaccine manufacturers can actually sue  those who  may  are  harmed by their faulty products. The litigation filed  during a n Indian court  may be a  countersuit to a lawsuit that has been filed against SII by  one in every of  the volunteers who participated in a trial study for the developmental C