Showing posts with label SARS-CoV-2. Show all posts
Showing posts with label SARS-CoV-2. Show all posts

3 logical fact-based issues to consider before taking the COVID-19 vaccine


 While the media resorts to accusing people of being “anti-vaxxers,” for not eager to take a fast-tracked coronavirus vaccine, and a few have gone thus far on even associate dissenters with being “anti-Semitic,” there are literally 3 very logical fact-based reasons why we must always question the protection of a coronavirus vaccine.

Multiple experts, including people who themselves actually administer vaccines, agree that fast-tracking a vaccine may be very dangerous.

According to immunologist and deputy editor of the journal Science Advances, Dr. Douglas J. Green, fast-tracking a vaccine could potentially be “catastrophic” and may not be rushed. He cites an example from 1966, during which two children actually died from an adverse reaction to a vaccine.

Two other historical examples that help maybe the potential danger of fast-tracking a vaccine, is that the Cutter incident from 1955 and therefore the mandatory flu vaccination campaign from 1976.

In 1955, 200,000 children received a polio vaccine from Cutter Laboratories which resulted in approximately 200 cases of paralysis and 10 deaths. In 1976, a compulsory vaccine campaign was imposed that likewise resulted in 53 deaths, and a comparatively high number of cases of Guillain Barre syndrome, which may likewise lead to permanent paralysis.

Normally, it takes around ten years to develop what's considered to be a “safe vaccine,” but now these Big Pharma/Vaccine companies — many of which are well-known for corruption and deceiving the general public concerning the hazards of their products — have produced a vaccine within a matter of months.

If that’s giant enough, the vaccine they're engaged in could be the latest technology, and new technologies generally involve new risks.

As I document in great detail in my 5-hour presentation, the large Pharma/Vaccine companies tasked with producing the coronavirus vaccine have terrible histories of consistent corruption and an untenable lack of ethics.

GlaxoSmithKline, the world’s most profitable vaccine manufacturer, for instanceencompasses a well-documented history of bribing doctors and health care officials. They’ve also experimented on vulnerable populations within us and Argentina and knowingly marketed dangerous products they knew to be dangerous. In Argentina, twelve of the youngsters died during their vaccine experimentations. the oldsters claim that they never gave their consent.

GSK is currently partnering with Sanofi to supply a coronavirus vaccine, which likewise includes a long history of bribery and corruption, and has more recently been charged with manslaughter because their drug Depakine was reportedly accountable for the deaths of 4 babies. they're also being prosecuted for misleading and false information about the drug.

Pfizer, who has already had its coronavirus vaccine approved within the UK, Canada, Bahrain, Kingdom of Saudi Arabiaand therefore u. s. too.

Like the aforementioned offenders, Pfizer also incorporates a long history of bribery and corruption and has likewise been caught experimenting on vulnerable segments of the population, both within us and Nigeria. In fact, during their experimentation in Nigeria, 11 children died, which the victims’ families say they never gave their actual consent for in the first place. Of course, Pfizer claims they did receive proper consent, but in line with diplomatic cables released by Wikileaks, the massive Pharma/Vaccine giant tried to blackmail the Nigerian government to forestall an investigation. This was also corroborated by an ex-employee.

Another company with an abysmal history of corruption, that has also been contracted to provide a coronavirus vaccine, is Johnson & Johnson.

Currently faced with several major lawsuits for fueling the opioid crisis within the US, Johnson & Johnson also includes a history of bribing doctors and officialdom. Even more disturbing still, a Reuters investigation found that J&J knowingly sold a powder product that they knew had asbestos in it, which causes mesothelioma, a rare type of cancer.

Along with Pfizer and another company tasked with producing a coronavirus vaccine named Astrazeneca, (see screenshot below) J&J is currently under investigation for helping fund terrorism in Iraq.

AstraZeneca corruption

According to Worldometers, a source trusted by governments around the world for statistics, 99.5% of active coronavirus cases worldwide are in “mild condition”.

When we take that into consideration, together with the actual fact that real-world studies show that anywhere between 25%-80% of infected people with COVID-19 don’t even know they need the virus — because they don’t even feel sick — the danger we collectively face from this disease is way further attenuated. In fact, to place this into perspective, the muse for Research on the civil right claims that children under the age of 15 are 6.83 to 20.07 times more likely to die of the flu or pneumonia than from this coronavirus, and in line with peer-reviewed research from Professor John Ioannidis on multiple countries during this pandemic, the danger of dying from COVID-19 for people under 65 is like the likelihood of dying in a very car accident whilst driving what would be considered a practical distance of travel.

It should even be said that getting vaccinated, historically speaking, doesn't guarantee immunity either, nor does it guarantee that we'll not spread the disease to others, and uncertainty that Pfizer’s chairman recently acknowledged in an interview.

In short, the authorities want us to require a fast-tracked vaccine, for a pestilence that's clearly not dangerous for the overwhelming majority of folks, and this vaccine doesn’t even guarantee that we won’t pass it on to others?

Please take a flash to logically consider that.




World’s biggest Vaccine Maker Suing guy for pronouncing COVID-19 Vaccine Injured Him


It should have already been considered a criminal offense against humanity decades ago that law makers were lobbied (bribed) into passing legislation within which vaccine manufacturers can not be held legally chargeable for any damage their products may cause. it absolutely was an act which established official protocols, like the key vaccine injury court to largely sweep under the rug any instances of such side effects.

But now a replacement lawsuit filed by the world’s largest vaccine manufacturer Serum Institute of India, in association with multinational pharmaceutical giant AstraZeneca, seeks to require this a step further — by attempting to line the precedent that vaccine manufacturers can actually sue those who may are harmed by their faulty products.

The litigation filed during an Indian court may be a countersuit to a lawsuit that has been filed against SII by one in every of the volunteers who participated in a trial study for the developmental Covisheild. A vaccination for SARS-CoV-2.

After participating within the trial study, the yet to be named volunteer flagged severe neurological and psychological symptoms 10 days after the primary injection. Symptoms which were then diagnosed as acute neurological encephalopathy, leading to cognitive state, lapses in cognitive functions like reasoning, and changes in personality. A legal notice had been sent to ICMR, DCGI, AstraZeneca and university to prevent testing, manufacturing and distributing the vaccine. The plaintiff filed a suit after the notice didn't receive response.

SII then filed a countersuit, worth $13.5 million, for defamation after alleging that the volunteers illness had nothing to try to to with the vaccine trial. this can be an announcement which was also protected by the info and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) and DCGI (Drugs Controllor General of India). However, these assertions are challenged by independent researcher Dr. Anant Bhan, the previous President of the International Association of Bioethics and current professor at India’s Yenepoya Medical University. Dr. Bhan notes that both of those institutions are government entities directly affiliated with SII, and stresses that transparency should be the highest priority only if the parties vested financial interests.

Speaking to Indian national news outlet Firstpost, he claims that the countersuit is completely “uncalled for”, and necessitated transparency, stating —

“It’s an unusual response, because the explanations for volunteers to participate are altruistic. If there's a priority that a volunteer has, it’s good to have interaction with them and understand what those concerns are, and to form efforts to undertake and address them. It’s within the interest of the sponsor, and is additionally a symbol to other participants already within the trial, and potential participants.”

“(It) could spook some people, if and when a vaccine becomes available. after you do get into these situations, it’s better to be open and transparent,”

“It’s quite possible that everything they’re saying is true. But that doesn’t change the very fact that there’s a conflict of interest,” said Bhan. “The regulator is being paid taxpayer money to be able to provide adequate oversight in these circumstances. The expectation is for the regulator to come back forward and speak on the difficulty.”

It has also been alleged, both by the plaintiff’s attorneys, and spokesman for the AIDAN (All India Drug Action Network), that the countersuit amounts to “an attempt of intimidation.”

In a statement released by the previous participants legal team, they say —

“This may be a clear try to intimidate our client. Why else will they file a Rs.100 crore defamation suit. Our client is simply requesting Rs.5 crore compensation for the health problems he's facing and to require care of his family.”

“Moreover, if you study their statement it's clear that they're unwilling to even investigate what exactly happened and if the side-effects are thanks to the vaccine. Our client wants the manufacturing of the vaccine to be stopped because he fears others could get affected the identical way,” says advocate NGR Prasad, a practicing attorney of over five decades.

Spokesman for the AIDAN also said in a very release —

“Instead of explaining why they need been silent about the reports of the SAE, Serum Institute is attempting to divert public scrutiny of its trial. Bear in mind that in Serum’s Phase 2/3 trial, safety is one in all the first endpoints additionally to immunogenicity.” explained AIDAN.

“Given that the SAE befell in October, it's of great concern that CDSCO failed to pause the trial to analyze the SAE when it had been reported. The silence from the CDSCO which granted permission for the trial is deafening.”

The monumental ramifications of this can not be understated. The world’s most lucrative and powerful vaccine manufacturer together with their government allies try to line a dire precedent; that in situ of transparency, investigation, and accountability they'll instead overtly threaten people who are potentially harmed by their products with lifelong bankruptcy as a tactic to intimidate them in to silence.

Even now, before the rollout has taken place the general public is already being conditioned to simply accept this lack of accountability as commonplace. On October 11th, 2020, The Wall Street Journal published an editorial titled “People Harmed by Coronavirus Vaccines Will Have Little Recourse”. In it, they indicated that those possibly harmed by a Covid-19 vaccine will instead not have their claim heard by the NVCIP, but rather the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Fund. A program even more parsimonious than the aforementioned.

The article stated — “This year, Secretary of Health and Human Services Alex Azar said the countermeasures fund should also cover injuries from Covid-19 vaccines, giving drug companies immunity from potential liability lawsuits.”

This is particularly insidious when put into the right context. it's been established in numerous instances that while vaccinations are largely beneficial, the human element involved within the manufacturing process aren't infallible. With specific respect to our current state of affairs it's already been highlighted in a very number of publications several issues arising with the event of a Covid-19 vaccine rushed through production, as noted by journalist Derrick Broze.

Even at the time of penning thisa brand new report has pop out of yet more volunteer injuries happening during another CV19 vaccine trial. this point leading to facial paralysis, and including a document from the FDA which indicated 84% of participants experienced some form of adverse reaction. And a separate report released by the FDA on the identical day confirming two post-vaccine deaths in one more trial.

But fret not, Reuters fact checked these claims and assures us there's nothing to stress about.

No causal relationship was established between the vaccine and therefore the two deaths, which occurred in line with the conventional death rate for the final population.

***

Four cases of Bell’s Palsy (partial facial paralysis) were also not considered to necessarily be caused by the vaccine but the symptom are under surveillance when the vaccine is distributed.

Furthermore these concerns are compounded with the well-documented history of malfeasance by every major manufacturer involved and it’s production (see here, here, here, here, & here), specifically AstraZeneca within the case of this SII lawsuit, who is already exempt from liability of any potential damages caused by their current Covid-19 vaccine in development.

The ethical struggle to take care of bodily autonomy and freedom of choice via consent could also be the new battle of our generation.

About the author – Don Via Jr. is an independent researcher and journalist from central Virginia, who has dedicated the last ten years to studying history, social science, geopolitics, and covert operations, and raising awareness about government corruption and abuses. he's the founding father of the up-starting independent media outlet Break The Matrix, where more of his work are often found further as on associated social media on MeWe, Twitter, and Minds.

In Anambra, three people were killed as they clashed with the police.

  Over the weekend, the situation in the Aguleri village, which is located in the Anambra East Local Government Area of the state of Anambra...