World’s biggest Vaccine Maker Suing guy for pronouncing COVID-19 Vaccine Injured Him

It should have already been considered a criminal offense against humanity decades ago that law makers were lobbied (bribed) into passing legislation within which vaccine manufacturers can not be held legally chargeable for any damage their products may cause. it absolutely was an act which established official protocols, like the key vaccine injury court to largely sweep under the rug any instances of such side effects.

But now a replacement lawsuit filed by the world’s largest vaccine manufacturer Serum Institute of India, in association with multinational pharmaceutical giant AstraZeneca, seeks to require this a step further — by attempting to line the precedent that vaccine manufacturers can actually sue those who may are harmed by their faulty products.

The litigation filed during an Indian court may be a countersuit to a lawsuit that has been filed against SII by one in every of the volunteers who participated in a trial study for the developmental Covisheild. A vaccination for SARS-CoV-2.

After participating within the trial study, the yet to be named volunteer flagged severe neurological and psychological symptoms 10 days after the primary injection. Symptoms which were then diagnosed as acute neurological encephalopathy, leading to cognitive state, lapses in cognitive functions like reasoning, and changes in personality. A legal notice had been sent to ICMR, DCGI, AstraZeneca and university to prevent testing, manufacturing and distributing the vaccine. The plaintiff filed a suit after the notice didn't receive response.

SII then filed a countersuit, worth $13.5 million, for defamation after alleging that the volunteers illness had nothing to try to to with the vaccine trial. this can be an announcement which was also protected by the info and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) and DCGI (Drugs Controllor General of India). However, these assertions are challenged by independent researcher Dr. Anant Bhan, the previous President of the International Association of Bioethics and current professor at India’s Yenepoya Medical University. Dr. Bhan notes that both of those institutions are government entities directly affiliated with SII, and stresses that transparency should be the highest priority only if the parties vested financial interests.

Speaking to Indian national news outlet Firstpost, he claims that the countersuit is completely “uncalled for”, and necessitated transparency, stating —

“It’s an unusual response, because the explanations for volunteers to participate are altruistic. If there's a priority that a volunteer has, it’s good to have interaction with them and understand what those concerns are, and to form efforts to undertake and address them. It’s within the interest of the sponsor, and is additionally a symbol to other participants already within the trial, and potential participants.”

“(It) could spook some people, if and when a vaccine becomes available. after you do get into these situations, it’s better to be open and transparent,”

“It’s quite possible that everything they’re saying is true. But that doesn’t change the very fact that there’s a conflict of interest,” said Bhan. “The regulator is being paid taxpayer money to be able to provide adequate oversight in these circumstances. The expectation is for the regulator to come back forward and speak on the difficulty.”

It has also been alleged, both by the plaintiff’s attorneys, and spokesman for the AIDAN (All India Drug Action Network), that the countersuit amounts to “an attempt of intimidation.”

In a statement released by the previous participants legal team, they say —

“This may be a clear try to intimidate our client. Why else will they file a Rs.100 crore defamation suit. Our client is simply requesting Rs.5 crore compensation for the health problems he's facing and to require care of his family.”

“Moreover, if you study their statement it's clear that they're unwilling to even investigate what exactly happened and if the side-effects are thanks to the vaccine. Our client wants the manufacturing of the vaccine to be stopped because he fears others could get affected the identical way,” says advocate NGR Prasad, a practicing attorney of over five decades.

Spokesman for the AIDAN also said in a very release —

“Instead of explaining why they need been silent about the reports of the SAE, Serum Institute is attempting to divert public scrutiny of its trial. Bear in mind that in Serum’s Phase 2/3 trial, safety is one in all the first endpoints additionally to immunogenicity.” explained AIDAN.

“Given that the SAE befell in October, it's of great concern that CDSCO failed to pause the trial to analyze the SAE when it had been reported. The silence from the CDSCO which granted permission for the trial is deafening.”

The monumental ramifications of this can not be understated. The world’s most lucrative and powerful vaccine manufacturer together with their government allies try to line a dire precedent; that in situ of transparency, investigation, and accountability they'll instead overtly threaten people who are potentially harmed by their products with lifelong bankruptcy as a tactic to intimidate them in to silence.

Even now, before the rollout has taken place the general public is already being conditioned to simply accept this lack of accountability as commonplace. On October 11th, 2020, The Wall Street Journal published an editorial titled “People Harmed by Coronavirus Vaccines Will Have Little Recourse”. In it, they indicated that those possibly harmed by a Covid-19 vaccine will instead not have their claim heard by the NVCIP, but rather the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Fund. A program even more parsimonious than the aforementioned.

The article stated — “This year, Secretary of Health and Human Services Alex Azar said the countermeasures fund should also cover injuries from Covid-19 vaccines, giving drug companies immunity from potential liability lawsuits.”

This is particularly insidious when put into the right context. it's been established in numerous instances that while vaccinations are largely beneficial, the human element involved within the manufacturing process aren't infallible. With specific respect to our current state of affairs it's already been highlighted in a very number of publications several issues arising with the event of a Covid-19 vaccine rushed through production, as noted by journalist Derrick Broze.

Even at the time of penning this, a brand new report has pop out of yet more volunteer injuries happening during another CV19 vaccine trial. this point leading to facial paralysis, and including a document from the FDA which indicated 84% of participants experienced some form of adverse reaction. And a separate report released by the FDA on the identical day confirming two post-vaccine deaths in one more trial.

But fret not, Reuters fact checked these claims and assures us there's nothing to stress about.

No causal relationship was established between the vaccine and therefore the two deaths, which occurred in line with the conventional death rate for the final population.

***

Four cases of Bell’s Palsy (partial facial paralysis) were also not considered to necessarily be caused by the vaccine but the symptom are under surveillance when the vaccine is distributed.

Furthermore these concerns are compounded with the well-documented history of malfeasance by every major manufacturer involved and it’s production (see here, here, here, here, & here), specifically AstraZeneca within the case of this SII lawsuit, who is already exempt from liability of any potential damages caused by their current Covid-19 vaccine in development.

The ethical struggle to take care of bodily autonomy and freedom of choice via consent could also be the new battle of our generation.

About the author – Don Via Jr. is an independent researcher and journalist from central Virginia, who has dedicated the last ten years to studying history, social science, geopolitics, and covert operations, and raising awareness about government corruption and abuses. he's the founding father of the up-starting independent media outlet Break The Matrix, where more of his work are often found further as on associated social media on MeWe, Twitter, and Minds.