3 logical fact-based issues to consider before taking the COVID-19 vaccine

 While the media resorts to accusing people of being “anti-vaxxers,” for not eager to take a fast-tracked coronavirus vaccine, and a few have gone thus far on even associate dissenters with being “anti-Semitic,” there are literally 3 very logical fact-based reasons why we must always question the protection of a coronavirus vaccine.

Multiple experts, including people who themselves actually administer vaccines, agree that fast-tracking a vaccine may be very dangerous.

According to immunologist and deputy editor of the journal Science Advances, Dr. Douglas J. Green, fast-tracking a vaccine could potentially be “catastrophic” and may not be rushed. He cites an example from 1966, during which two children actually died from an adverse reaction to a vaccine.

Two other historical examples that help maybe the potential danger of fast-tracking a vaccine, is that the Cutter incident from 1955 and therefore the mandatory flu vaccination campaign from 1976.

In 1955, 200,000 children received a polio vaccine from Cutter Laboratories which resulted in approximately 200 cases of paralysis and 10 deaths. In 1976, a compulsory vaccine campaign was imposed that likewise resulted in 53 deaths, and a comparatively high number of cases of Guillain Barre syndrome, which may likewise lead to permanent paralysis.

Normally, it takes around ten years to develop what's considered to be a “safe vaccine,” but now these Big Pharma/Vaccine companies — many of which are well-known for corruption and deceiving the general public concerning the hazards of their products — have produced a vaccine within a matter of months.

If that’s giant enough, the vaccine they're engaged in could be the latest technology, and new technologies generally involve new risks.

As I document in great detail in my 5-hour presentation, the large Pharma/Vaccine companies tasked with producing the coronavirus vaccine have terrible histories of consistent corruption and an untenable lack of ethics.

GlaxoSmithKline, the world’s most profitable vaccine manufacturer, for instance, encompasses a well-documented history of bribing doctors and health care officials. They’ve also experimented on vulnerable populations within us and Argentina and knowingly marketed dangerous products they knew to be dangerous. In Argentina, twelve of the youngsters died during their vaccine experimentations. the oldsters claim that they never gave their consent.

GSK is currently partnering with Sanofi to supply a coronavirus vaccine, which likewise includes a long history of bribery and corruption, and has more recently been charged with manslaughter because their drug Depakine was reportedly accountable for the deaths of 4 babies. they're also being prosecuted for misleading and false information about the drug.

Pfizer, who has already had its coronavirus vaccine approved within the UK, Canada, Bahrain, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, and therefore u. s. too.

Like the aforementioned offenders, Pfizer also incorporates a long history of bribery and corruption and has likewise been caught experimenting on vulnerable segments of the population, both within us and Nigeria. In fact, during their experimentation in Nigeria, 11 children died, which the victims’ families say they never gave their actual consent for in the first place. Of course, Pfizer claims they did receive proper consent, but in line with diplomatic cables released by Wikileaks, the massive Pharma/Vaccine giant tried to blackmail the Nigerian government to forestall an investigation. This was also corroborated by an ex-employee.

Another company with an abysmal history of corruption, that has also been contracted to provide a coronavirus vaccine, is Johnson & Johnson.

Currently faced with several major lawsuits for fueling the opioid crisis within the US, Johnson & Johnson also includes a history of bribing doctors and officialdom. Even more disturbing still, a Reuters investigation found that J&J knowingly sold a powder product that they knew had asbestos in it, which causes mesothelioma, a rare type of cancer.

Along with Pfizer and another company tasked with producing a coronavirus vaccine named Astrazeneca, (see screenshot below) J&J is currently under investigation for helping fund terrorism in Iraq.

AstraZeneca corruption

According to Worldometers, a source trusted by governments around the world for statistics, 99.5% of active coronavirus cases worldwide are in “mild condition”.

When we take that into consideration, together with the actual fact that real-world studies show that anywhere between 25%-80% of infected people with COVID-19 don’t even know they need the virus — because they don’t even feel sick — the danger we collectively face from this disease is way further attenuated. In fact, to place this into perspective, the muse for Research on the civil right claims that children under the age of 15 are 6.83 to 20.07 times more likely to die of the flu or pneumonia than from this coronavirus, and in line with peer-reviewed research from Professor John Ioannidis on multiple countries during this pandemic, the danger of dying from COVID-19 for people under 65 is like the likelihood of dying in a very car accident whilst driving what would be considered a practical distance of travel.

It should even be said that getting vaccinated, historically speaking, doesn't guarantee immunity either, nor does it guarantee that we'll not spread the disease to others, and uncertainty that Pfizer’s chairman recently acknowledged in an interview.

In short, the authorities want us to require a fast-tracked vaccine, for a pestilence that's clearly not dangerous for the overwhelming majority of folks, and this vaccine doesn’t even guarantee that we won’t pass it on to others?

Please take a flash to logically consider that.