The Latest Video Reveals Cops Suspect Jaywalking Man And Shoot Him For It

 Walking across the road in an exceedingly manner not acceptable the Caesarism can often end in serious injury or death — not necessarily thanks to a car running you over either. The enforcement of jaywalking laws during this country has gone to the acute and a brand new video of two Orange County sheriff’s deputies killing a person for crossing the road during a way they failed to approve, illustrates this perfectly.

On September 23, Kurt Andras Reinhold, 42, had committed no crime, had harmed nobody, and was merely attempting to urge to the opposite side of the road when two Orange County deputies targeted him for extortion. Because law enforcement’s only tool is that the escalation of force — which is escalated to deadly levels to enforce entirely arbitrary dictates designed to extract revenue from citizens — Reinhold would never make it across the road that day.

Though the incident happened last September, the police hardly released the videos of it. it's a mix of dash camera, cellphone, and surveillance footage and it's nothing in need of infuriating. what's also notable is that despite the actual fact the officers were wearing body cameras, none of that footage was released.

According to the department, the 2 deputies involved, an 8 and 13-year veteran, are full-time homeless liaison officers in San Clemente. The department says their duties involve assisting those living on the streets and helping them access resources and services. However, as you watch the video below, “helping and assisting” is that the absolute final thing you'd ever describe their actions as.

As the video shows, the deputies roll up to Reinhold, anticipating that he was near to cross the road.

“Watch this, he’s visiting jaywalk,” one amongst the cops says as they discuss harassing Reinhold.

The deputies then debate whether he’s jaywalking, with the opposite deputy saying, “Don’t make case law, Gabriel.”

Clearly, one deputy was trying to speak the opposite out of harassing a totally innocent man for crossing the road. But “Gabriel” seemed hell-bent on harassing and eventually killing the person.

Clearly confident that he had done absolutely nothing wrong — which he had not — Reinhold walks removed from the deputies after they pulled up and exited their cruiser.

“Are you visiting stop or are we visiting should cause you to stop?” the tyrant, whose job consists of escalating force to deadly conditions to prevent people from incorrectly crossing the road.

“For what?” Reinhold responds, clearly oblivious to why the cops stopped him.

“For jaywalking,” the officer answers.

“What are you talking about? I’m walking,” Reinhold says, completely surprised that he's being targeted for trying to induce from one side of the road to the opposite.

Remember, Reinhold had harmed nobody, nobody was in harm’s way, nobody was threatened, and everyone he wanted to try and do was cross the road. But these deputies weren't having it. rather than letting the person cross the road, they escalated force, eventually throwing Reinhold to the bottom, where a struggle ensued as Reinhold attempted to defend himself against his aggressors.

During the struggle, one in all the deputies shouts, “He’s got my gun,” in line with the Sheriff’s Department.

Seconds later, two shots are heard, one about seven seconds after the opposite.

When the shooting originally happened, investigators released a still image from the surveillance camera which appears to indicate Reinhold’s hand near the officer’s weapon. Though his hand appears near the weapon, police never claimed that he was able to get the officer’s weapon.

According to police, the investigation continues to be underway.

FOX 59 reports Reinhold’s family, who filed a decease lawsuit within the case in December, released a press release through their lawyers Wednesday saying the new video “confirms what we knew right along – the involved deputies had no reason to prevent Mr. Reinhold.”

“The OC Sheriffs Homeless Liaison Officers use pretext reasons to prevent anyone for any reason they need, simply to harass the person,” attorney John C. Taylor wrote. “These officers created and escalated the confrontation with Kurt Reinhold causing his death.”

We agree.

As the assassination attempt on Donald Trump proved in 2016, it's virtually impossible to require a cop’s gun.

The reason a police officer’s weapon is so hard to require is because of the multiple safety checks built into the holsters. It appears from the video that the sort of holster that this officer was wearing, which the bulk of law enforcement officials wear, maybe a Dual Retention Hooded Holster, with the optional hood guard.

The “hood” of the holster, or the strap that holds the weapon within the hard plastic holster, must be pushed down from a selected angle and so pushed forward, before exposing the rear of the weapon.

During a struggle, it's possible that the hood can be pulled down, exposing the rear of the gun. However, there's one more line of defense. The hood guard adds another entirely new level of pistol retention because it is specially designed to forestall an assailant from pushing down the hood.

Even if the hood guard was removed and therefore the hood was pushed back, there's one more fail-safe. The third line of retention during this holster doesn't give the pistol to be removed, nor the slide pulled back, without knowing exactly a way to lift it out of the holster.

These holsters usually have a tension screw in situ that permits its users to line the required level of friction needed to get rid of the pistol. However, if someone tries to tug the pistol out of the holster in any direction apart from the officer’s set preference, the slide won't rack, nor will the pistol take off.

Knowing the function of police holsters and also the multiple lines of retention built into them, the claim of “he went for my gun,” seems more sort of a reason to justify deadly force after the actual fact than a reason for actually needing deadly force.