Trump Secretly planned to make bigger the Police state, grant limitless Protections to law enforcement officials

 A draft report from the Presidential Commission on enforcement and therefore the Administration of Justice reveals the Trump administration’s commitment to further expand the national totalitarianism, with stress on supporting and expanding qualified immunity and biometric authentication.

The president formed the commission via executive order in January. A federal judge recently blocked the discharge of the commission’s report thanks to a scarcity of diversity on the panel and evidence that it operated in secrecy in violation of public meeting laws.

The writ stemmed from a lawsuit filed by the NAACP Legal Defense and academic Fund (NAACP LDF). The suit claimed the commission did not provide proper notice of public hearing which gave an excessive amount of influence to enforcement interests in violation of laws dictating how federal advisory committees must operate.

According to a Reuters report, “The panel’s 18 commissioners include federal, state and native enforcement representatives, but no civil rights advocates, defense attorneys or big-city police officials.”

Through an open records request, Reuters obtained a draft of the commission’s report, revealing an inspiration to further empower enforcement within us. a replacement York Times op-ed declared, “The president’s commission was considering recommendations that might transform this nation into a dystopian absolutism.”

The report recommends increasing “due process” protections for police offers facing charges of misconduct, and called on the Justice Department to regularly affirm support for qualified immunity.

Federal courts created the qualified immunity legal defense and applied it across the U.S. through in incorporation doctrine. In practice, the federal courts have cemented a system in situ that provides enforcement officers almost complete immunity and allows them to violate any individual’s rights with virtual impunity. the matter isn’t a scarcity of group action for cops; it's a system that offers them almost unlimited protections. The commission’s recommendations not only affirms the system but would give even more power to police.

For instance, per Reuters, “proposals included allowing officers accused of wrongdoing to look at body camera footage before talking to internal investigators.”

The report also entails increased federal funding for biometric identification technologies while many nations are working to limit or ban their use.

The center has been developing a large, nationwide biometric identification system for years. The FBI extended a nationwide facial-recognition program within the fall of 2014, with the goal of building an enormous biometric database with pictures provided by the states and company friends.

In 2016, the middle on Privacy and Technology at Georgetown Law released “The Perpetual Lineup,” a large report on enforcement use of automatic face recognition technology within the U.S. you'll read the entire report at perpetuallineup.org. The organization conducted a year-long investigation and picked up quite 15,000 pages of documents through over 100 public records requests. The report paints a disturbing picture of intense cooperation between the central, and state and native enforcement to develop a large biometric authentication database.

“Face recognition may be a powerful technology that needs strict oversight. But those controls, by and enormous, don’t exist today,” report co-author Clare Garvie said. “With only some exceptions, there aren't any laws governing police use of the technology, no standards ensuring its accuracy, and no systems checking for bias. It’s a West.”

There are many technical and legal problems with biometric identification, including significant concerns about the accuracy of the technology, particularly when reading the facial expression of minority populations. During a test go by the ACLU of Northern California, face recognition misidentified 26 members of the California legislature as people in a very database of arrest photos.

With biometric identification technology, police and other organization have the aptitude to trace individuals in real-time. These systems allow enforcement agents to use video cameras and continually scan everybody who walks by. in line with the report, several major police departments have expressed an interest in this form of real-time tracking. Documents revealed agencies in a minimum of five major cities, including la, either claimed to run real-time face recognition off of street cameras, bought technology with the aptitude, or expressed written interest in buying it.

The federal heavily involves itself in helping state and native agencies obtain this technology. The commission report recommends ramping it up even further.

The commission also wants to strip away privacy protections and make it easier for cops to access encrypted information on your phone.

Not only does the Presidential Commission on enforcement and therefore the Administration of Justice propose policies that will expand the ever-growing national police-state, but it also represents an extra expansion of unconstitutional federal power. The national has no constitutional role in state and native policing. Police powers were among the powers supporters of the Constitution specifically said would remain with state governments.

The centralized has monopolized education, healthcare, environmental regulation, the economy, and more. Now it’s within the process of monopolizing enforcement. Given the fed’s memoir on everything else it controls, we must always be wary of this movement to nationalize policing. It won’t end well.