Massive Masked Officer Attacks and Knocks Woman to the Ground for Being in a Park at Night

In the land of the free, if a police officer desires to extort you, even for a minor offence in which there is no victim, they may and will use force to do so. Angel Guice, who had never before interacted with police, learned this lesson the hard way over the weekend when an Atlanta police officer assaulted her during an extortion attempt.

The argument occurred late on a Sunday evening at Shady Valley Park when Guice and her unidentified male companion were enjoying a pleasant summer evening outside. With the arrival of Atlanta police officer Brooks, however, that tranquilly would come to an abrupt end.

Apparently, Guice and her buddy were allegedly at the park after it had closed, which constitutes extortion. The pair were unaware that the park had been completed less than one hour before the arrival of the inspector. Officer Brooks opted to extort the pair with tickets for being at the park after it had closed, as opposed to just instructing them to leave.

A video uploaded on Instagram by Guice's sister depicts the subsequent events. She refused to sign the ticket because she believed she had committed no offence. She then requested the officer's name and badge number.

Officer Brooks used his power to abduct Guice for failing to sign the ticket quickly enough. Despite Guice's concession that she would now sign the ticket, this occurred.

Guice adds, "I understand, but I'm going to sign the ticket" as officer Brooks prepares to physically confront her.

"Place your hands behind your back," said Officer Brooks.

"Mr. Brooks, I'm going to sign the ticket," she declares as he prepares to cage her for being at a park less than an hour after it closed.

Officer Brooks proceeded to use force because Guice did not want to be abducted and incarcerated for attending a park whose maintenance was paid for by her taxes. Guice was then flung to the ground by the enormous officer who, for some reason, was wearing a baclava.

Guice exclaims, "Oh my God, I'm so terrified!" She cries out as a police officer twice her height climbs her, takes out his taser, and shoves it in her face while holding her down on the ground.

Guice was beaten physically, placed in handcuffs, transported to prison, and placed in a cage for being in a park at night.

Notably, the Atlanta police department supports the officer's conduct, citing Guice's initial refusal to sign the citation as justification for the officer's use of force against an otherwise completely innocent woman.

When a person refuses to sign a ticket, the APD added in a long statement, "the officer may then physically arrest the suspect."

According to the police, she started aggressively opposing his attempts. As the police sought to take her into jail, this ended in a violent struggle. "

The statement in part reads:

To address the numerous issues raised by the female:

An officer is not compelled to read Miranda rights to a suspect prior to arrest.

The officer was permitted to wear a mask and rubber gloves in an effort to protect himself from communicable viruses or illnesses.

If, after an officer informs you that you will be brought to prison for a certain offence, you choose to test the officer's limits, you will end up in jail.

This event started with an attempt to address problems in our public parks. Clearly, the officer meant to give citations to each group and allow them to exit the park. Multiple foolish actions that were completely beyond our control led to a violent fight with a police officer and this guy's arrest.

Guice's sister disagreed with this concept when she shared a video of the confrontation on Instagram with the caption, "Where's the respect as a citizen?" Are we not permitted to inquire about our rights without letting our egos take over? Why was a taser withdrawn? Why was she patted down by a male police officer? Aren't the cops here to serve and protect? What kind of instruction is this? "

Link for the video on YT:

Link for the video on IG:

Link for the video on Rumble:

"Mommy Help": Cops Pin Down Teen in Front of His Parents for Six Minutes Until He Stops Breathing and Dies

On September 15, 2018, Anton Black's family watched in horror as Greensboro police officers followed their 19-year-old son to the door of their house, pinned him down, and then kneeled on him for six minutes until he became unconscious and died. Since that awful day over four years ago, no one has been held responsible for his death.

This Thursday, the Maryland taxpayers were informed that they would be held accountable for the actions of the implicated cops to the tune of $5,000,000.00. The parents of Black recently resolved a federal lawsuit alleging that their son's death in custody was racist and illegal. The complaint also says that the state medical examiner worked with the police to hide "wrongdoing by officers."

Less than a year after his death, the cops responsible were exonerated. Now, the family hopes that their son's death will not have been in vain and that all agencies engaged in Black's murder will undergo transformation.

"It's an old-fashioned boy thing." "No charges," said Anton Black, the father of Black. "They murdered him without so much as a minor charge. If they did to a dog what they did to my kid, someone would be prosecuted and put in prison. These men should be incarcerated.

Renee Swafford, one of the family's lawyers, said that Anton Black had 43 blunt trauma wounds during his confrontation with police officers, notwithstanding the autopsy's conclusion that he had suffered a "cardiac episode." According to the medical examiner, this did not contribute to Black's death.

Even though the state said at first that Black was high on drugs, neither drugs nor alcohol were found in his system.

In accordance with the New York Times:

The complaint also claimed that the cops attempted to cover up an unjustifiable homicide by alleging that Mr Black had "superhuman" powers while under the influence of marijuana combined with another narcotic.

David Fowler, the state's medical examiner at the time, produced an autopsy report four months later that attributed Mr Black's death to congenital heart defects and classified it as an accident, stating that there was no indication that the police officers' actions had a part in it. The case filed by Mr Black's family against the medical examiner's office and Mr Fowler, who is also named as defendants, is ongoing.

Judge Catherine Blake of the U.S. District Court in Maryland ruled earlier this year that the video footage of Mr Black's interaction with the police "does not 'clearly contradict' and overwhelm the plaintiffs' accusations" of excessive force, dealing a defeat to the police department's case.

On the day he died, Black and his cousin were playing when someone reported an abduction. Black, who had bipolar disorder, was getting into a car when the police showed up. Officer Thomas Webster broke the window and shocked Black.

Black ran slowly back home before being apprehended and pushed down by three cops and a bystander on his own front door until he stopped breathing.

According to family members, Anton Black begged "Mommy, help" for six minutes while cops crushed his face, chest, and stomach to the ground. He was transported to a local hospital, where he was confirmed dead later on.

As part of the lawsuit, the department that was involved in Black's death will have to provide more resources for police officers who deal with mental health emergencies. These resources will include de-escalation training, lessons on implicit bias, and clear hiring practices. Black's parents hope that this will keep other teenagers from having the same thing happen to them.

Black's mother, Jennell Black, stated in a letter to the Times, "There are no words to explain the indescribable anguish I will always feel when I recall that horrible day and think about my son." No other family should have to endure what we did. I hope police department improvements will save lives and prevent other families from experiencing the daily suffering we endure. "

Link to the video on TikTok:

Link to the video on IG:

Link to the video on YT:

Link to the video on Rumble:

Four police officers have been charged in Breonna Taylor's death, despite their initial belief that they had escaped punishment.

On September 23, 2020, police were put on high alert, streets in downtown Louisville were closed, and government buildings were boarded up as charges were brought against former officer Brett Hankison for his part in the raid that killed Breonna Taylor.

As a result, the subsequent uproar was well-deserved. Instead, this gun-happy cowboy officer was charged with "first-degree reckless endangerment" because he fired like a madman during the raid, sending bullets paid for by taxpayers into nearby homes.

Hankison was found not guilty on three counts of reckless endangerment in March. This led to a new wave of protests.

Then, this month, retired officer Hankison had all references to these charges expunged from the public record, as if he had never shot indiscriminately into the home of Breonna Taylor. This was a severe blow to the family.

This week, however, the FBI stormed the scene and detained a number of the participating policemen. The FBI has charged four Louisville Metro Police Department officers in connection with Taylor's murder.

On Thursday, the federal government arrested former LMPD officers Joshua Jaynes, Brett Hankison, and Kelly Hanna Goodlett, as well as current LMPD sergeant Kyle Meany.

LMPD launched termination procedures against Meany and Goodlett on Thursday, stating in a statement after the DOJ's decision.

The department said in a statement, "We must send any concerns about this federal investigation to the FBI, but any illegal or improper behaviour by law enforcement must be dealt with thoroughly if we want to keep working to build trust between the police and the community."

As reported by the Courier-Journal:

One of the new charges that the DOJ released on Thursday has to do with the lies Haynes, Meany, and Goodlett told to get a warrant to search Taylor's house.

In a separate indictment, Hankison is charged with using "unconstitutionally excessive force during the raid on Ms. Taylor's home" because he fired 10 shots into an occupied, neighbouring apartment "without a lawful objective justifying the use of deadly force," Assistant Attorney General Kristen Clarke for the Civil Rights Division announced at a news conference alongside Garland on Thursday morning in Washington, D.C.

As part of its investigation, the DOJ has also looked closely at the LMPD's rules and training, as well as its system for overseeing officers and holding them accountable, as well as its investigations of wrongdoing.

Despite Taylor being absolutely innocent and being slain while unarmed in her own home, and despite her boyfriend, Kenneth Walker being deemed justifiable in firing at the cops during the raid, not a single officer was held accountable for her killing for two years, until now.

As we reported at the time, Hankison and other cops shot more than twenty bullets at Taylor and her boyfriend during a failed narcotics raid that night.

Breonna's boyfriend, who was first accused of murder, said that Taylor did not pass away after being shot. Instead, she battled to regain her breath, desperately needing the assistance that the cops refused to provide despite Walker's pleading.

"(Police are) hollering, 'Come out!' while I'm on the phone with her" (mom). As reported by USA Today, Walker said in a taped police interview three hours after the shooting, "I'm still hollering 'help' because she's coughing over here, and I'm just freaking out."

The dispatch records suggest that no attempt was made to save Breonna's life that night, and she lay in her hallway for nearly 20 minutes after being fatally shot.

"Multiple rounds of gunfire hit Breonna, who was unarmed and in her hallway." In a new complaint filed on behalf of Taylor's family, lawyers Sam Aguiar and Lonita Baker noted, "She was not murdered instantly." She survived for an additional five to six minutes before dying of her injuries on the floor of her residence.

Officers used their resources to place a tourniquet on Sgt. Jonathan Mattingly's leg after he was shot by Walker, who mistook him for an intruder. Instead of assisting the EMT who had just been pierced, they tended to Sgt. Mattingly.

Given that the department declined to investigate or prosecute the officers implicated in Taylor's death, it is probable that these officers believed they had gotten away with it. Not any longer.

Cop Sexually Assaults Man with Anal Cavity in Public Search for Non-Existent Pharmaceuticals

In the apparent country of liberty, you are not free to do as you choose with your body. From mandated vaccines to abortions after rape, the state will stop at nothing in its terrifying quest to control the single thing you have complete control over. As the vaccine and abortion debates boil on, another equally horrific infringement of bodily autonomy proceeds virtually unimpeded in the background, all owing to the war on drugs.

Insidious is the state's practice of kidnapping and imprisoning individuals for using drugs considered unlawful by the ruling class. However, when representatives of that state strive to physically violate an individual's body in a greedy and sexual way—in quest of these drugs—it is not only deceptive but it may be deemed a crime against humanity.

Sadly, many who continue to conduct this fruitless war on drugs do not share this view. As the following example demonstrates, order followers have no trouble maintaining this practice of state-sanctioned highway rape in order to get drugs that their leaders have instructed them to be unlawful.

This week, a camera from Lynchburg, Virginia, showed this reprehensible and exploitative conduct. The footage is part of a lawsuit against the Lynchburg police department for the actual roadside rape of a man by a police officer searching for illicit drugs.

In the footage, an unidentified cop is seen searching a restrained man's trousers for nonexistent items. In the tape, the guy recording can be heard stating, "They searched for him but found nothing." They harmed him. He put his fingers up his buttocks but could not locate any dung.

According to the complaint and the victim, this is precisely what transpired that day, and it occurred in broad daylight as horrified witnesses looked on in terror.

"He has gloves on." "He slips his hand down the front of my trousers, feels between my crotch and testicles, and all of that," the lawsuit's unidentified plaintiff told ABC13. "He reaches inside the back of my jeans, places his palm on my rectum, and swiping upward, I felt a stinging agony."

He added, "It's really embarrassing for a mature guy to admit that another man inserted his finger in his rectum."

Certainly, and that is why he has filed a lawsuit.

"My client said that he was being raped and begged his attacker to stop." The officer kept speaking. In an interview, Cam Warren, the victim's attorney, said, "He discovered nothing."

The fact that another victim has come forward stating that he was subjected to a similar act of sexual assault by this officer is indicative of a pattern of abuse. In fact, the first victim claims to know at least fifteen more victims of this officer's sexual assault.

"He searched me once at first." "He undid my belt, stroked my thighs, and then returned to my buttocks," the second victim said in an interview. "It made me feel uneasy." I never imagined you could do such a thing to people. "

Nevertheless, if you're the Lynchburg police department, you can and will get away with it.

According to ABC 13, neither victim received a single drug charge, their sexual assaults were in vain, and the participating cop is still on active duty.

Both males report being stopped for driving offences. Online court documents reveal that they were subsequently charged with similar charges. For example, the first complainant, who is suing the officer, was convicted of two misdemeanours, including careless driving and driving with a suspended licence. In respect to these instances, neither man was charged with a drug violation since, according to them, they did not have any narcotics on them.

"If the ordinary person did it, they would be prosecuted for sexual assault," ex-FBI agent and ABC News contributor Brad Garrett stated.

Indeed, But if you have a badge and a pistol, you may sexually attack an otherwise innocent guy and say you did it for the sake of the drug war without facing any repercussions.

After seeing the cop who allegedly abused them go unpunished, his claimed victims are now demanding an inquiry and charges.

The second accuser said, "I just want [the cop] to be held responsible for his actions." I do not believe you should treat individuals in such a manner.

The first victim said, "This kind of thing only occurs in metropolitan areas." "I was spotless." I was harmed. They caused me anguish.

Hopefully, justice will be served.

Link on YT:

Link on rumble:

Link on TikTok:

Body Cam Captures Police Killing a Handcuffed Woman by Dropping Her From a Patrol Car

Prior to her tragic death last month, Brianna Grier, like so many others before her, was afflicted with mental illness. Occasionally, this mother of two would need hospitalisation in order to regain her ability to function. But when police officers, instead of EMS, arrived and took Brianna to prison instead of the hospital, Brianna never had a chance to regain her functionality. Instead, she would be tossed from a police car as it was travelling down the road, and she would perish.

In a visit to Mary and Marvin Grier last month, Hancock County Sheriff Terrell Primus informed them that their daughter Brianna had been evacuated to Grady Hospital in Atlanta. According to the sheriff, Brianna had kicked open the police vehicle door and leapt out while it was moving. Nevertheless, according to a newly revealed body camera video and the Georgia Bureau of Investigation inquiry, responding police failed to shut the passenger door, resulting in her fatal fall.

Brianna's parents and sister phoned 911 on July 14 when she had a schizophrenia episode. She was experiencing a mental health crisis. Marvin Grier informed WMAZ that this was not Brianna's first psychotic episode. Typically, he said, EMS would arrive, bring her to Atrium Health Navicent Baldwin, and take her to the mental ward, but this time was different. Brianna received firearms and identification badges instead of ambulances and medical beds.

The 28-year-old was placed in handcuffs by two deputies who arrived at the house between midnight and one o'clock in the morning. Due to her panic and fear, the deputies believed it would be prudent to shock her with a taser before placing her in the back of the vehicle.

Brianna is shown on body camera video laying on the ground, hysterical and terrified. The deputies then take her by the shoulders and feet and toss her into the trunk of the police vehicle. Before departing, one deputy questioned the other, "Is the passenger door closed?" He answered affirmatively.

Nonetheless, according to the News & Observer, citing further evidence, the GBI said that one of the deputies unlocked the back passenger side door during Grier's arrest but neglected to shut it before leaving. According to authorities, Grier was shackled and not wearing a seat belt at the time of the incident.

She was to be transported to the sheriff's office, but she would never arrive.

Brianna, who was alive before entering the vehicle with cops, was pronounced dead on the side of the road as two deputies slapped her and tried to sit her upright.

As was reported last week, the following day the sheriff informed the family that she had "kicked the door out and leaped out of the vehicle," according to Marvin Grier of WMAZ.

When the Griers arrived at the hospital to see Brianna, they were devastated to discover that she was on life support.

I just broke down and wept because it's so absurd that she was lying up there with tubes and wires all over her for no reason since it didn't have to be that. "It didn't have to be like that," remarked Mary Grier.

Brianna would pass away in four days.

As the family started the process of mourning, they also had many questions. Given that police patrol vehicle doors cannot be opened from the inside, how did Brianna "fall" out of the car after kicking through the door?

Marvin Grier said, "I would do what any other parent would do, and that's what we're trying to do: find answers."

"If she exited the vehicle, they had to let her out." "In a police cruiser, you cannot unlock the door from the inside, therefore it must have been from the outside," Mary Grier said last week.

Now, the family's position has been vindicated. Brianna never kicked through the door since it was never locked, and her death resulted from ineffective police.

Due to ineptitude or malice, the deputies who took up Brianna that night have shattered a family. The two daughters of Brianna will now grow up without their mother.

The graphic body camera footage is seen below. Warning: this is unsettling.

Link to the video on youtube:

Link to the video on tiktok:

Link to the video on IG:

Link to the video on Rumble:

The city will not release the body cam footage of an innocent man being fatally beaten for fear that it would spark riots.

As is often documented, complete innocence is no shield against police brutality. Too often, police state defenders say, "If you don't want to die at the hands of the police, don't violate the law." Not only is the basis of this argument erroneous, since violating the law is not a justification for death, but these individuals are also disregarding the instances in which completely innocent people have been victimised by police brutality. Joseph Pettaway was among these innocent individuals.

On the evening of July 7, 2018, Pettaway died when Montgomery Police officer Nicholas Barber unleashed his K-9 on the innocent man and forced him to maul him for more than two minutes. Pettaway would die from his wounds.

Joseph's sister, Yvonne Pettaway-Frazier, told the Montgomery Advertiser, "I witnessed it with my own eyes." His whole body was on the ground that morning. Since then, the family has launched a lawsuit to seek justice.

The Pettaway family has campaigned for years to get the body camera video, which, according to them, the police never recognised existed. As part of their lawsuit, the family has now gotten the footage, which purportedly shows cops laughing as Pettaway dies at their feet and confirms their allegations.

This footage has been a source of contention as police refuse to disclose it out of concern that it may incite riots among Montgomery residents. Christopher East, the city attorney of Montgomery, stated in a report by Lynda Edwards the city's contentious justification for keeping this film hidden.

According to the city attorney, the film has "the potential to create or facilitate public disorder based only on its horrific imagery."

Robert Balin, an expert on the First Amendment and lecturer at Columbia Law School, told Edwards, "An imagined fear that riots may occur if people react in a particular way is very different from citing specific national security concerns, such as the life of an undercover law enforcement agent being at risk if certain information is released."

On the night he was mauled to death, Pettaway had not injured anybody and had not committed a crime. Nevertheless, he was murdered because the police opted to escalate to lethal force first and then ask questions. The cops reportedly responded to a burglary in progress complaint that evening. But there was no theft.

Pettaway had a key to his mother's residence and was authorised to be there. However, instead of just asking the guy to come outside or banging on the door, Officer Barber launched the K-9, blind to the possibility that the individual or individuals inside may be innocent.

"It might have been a child in there," claimed Walter Pettaway, brother of Joseph. Indeed,

According to the family's complaint, Pettaway was bitten by the K-9 for about two minutes before Barber removed the animal. According to the lawsuit, throughout the remainder of the video, "despite Mr. Pettaway's obvious and profuse bleeding and his apparent shock, no police officer examines or evaluates JLP's wound and no police officer administers the most basic, essential, obvious, and immediately required care to stem or reduce his bleeding."

Instead of assisting the family in their pursuit of justice for their deceased loved one, the city and department have circled the waggons and refused to cooperate. The refusal to provide the footage is a significant aspect of this lack of cooperation.

"The video footage is certainly incriminating," argues the plaintiff's request to remove the secret classification. However, neither the extreme odiousness nor the shockingly reprehensible release of the police dog to attack Mr Pettaway, nor the failure of the defendants to attend to Mr Pettaway's imminently fatal injury that their dog inflicted, entitles the defendants to conceal or conceal the video recording of those actions and inactions."

Barber has not yet been charged in this matter, and it is unknown whether or not he received internal punishment since the department refuses to accept that he is employed by them.

Joseph's sister made a perceptive statement after her brother's death. If the positions were reversed and Joseph had hurt the K-9, you can be guaranteed that he would be incarcerated at this moment. Due to the fact that the guy whose K-9 killed an innocent man is armed and has a badge, no one has been arrested, and it is unlikely that anybody ever will be.

"They stood there and let the dog murder him," claimed Lizzie Mae Pettaway. "They must pay for their actions. If someone had killed the dog, they would have demanded compensation."

"He was the son of someone, the brother of somebody, and the uncle of somebody. Frazier-Pettaway said that he was not simply a piece of flesh." At some point, kids just assess someone based on their appearance or where they hang out. They would not appreciate such treatment. I do not wish anybody ill fortune, but you should not judge others based on their appearance or attire. "[You shouldn't] simply stand there and carry on a conversation after allowing the dog to rip him to shreds and watch him bleed to death."

We agree.

Police Claimed They Lied About the Handcuffed Woman Who Kicked Open the Police Car Door, Fell Out, and Died.

Brianna Grier was transported to Grady Hospital in Atlanta, Georgia when Hancock County Sheriff Terrell Primus visited Mary and Marvin Grier earlier this month. According to the sheriff, Brianna had kicked open the police vehicle door and leapt out while it was moving.

Brianna's parents and sister phoned 911 on July 14 when she had a schizophrenia episode. Marvin Grier informed WMAZ that this was not Brianna's first psychotic episode. Typically, he said, EMS would arrive, bring her to Atrium Health Navicent Baldwin, and take her to the mental ward, but this time was different. Brianna received firearms and identification badges instead of ambulances and medical beds.

Instead of EMS, two deputies came to the residence between midnight and one in the morning, handcuffed the 28-year-old, and placed her in the back of the deputy's vehicle.

She was to be transported to the sheriff's office, but she would never arrive.

The following day, the sheriff informed the family that she had "kicked the door out and leaped out of the vehicle," according to Marvin Grier of WMAZ.

When the Griers arrived at the hospital to see Brianna, they were devastated to discover that she was on life support.

I just broke down and wept because it's so absurd that she was lying up there with tubes and wires all over her for no reason since it didn't have to be that. "It didn't have to be like that," remarked Mary Grier.

Brianna would die four days later.

As the family started the process of mourning, they also had many questions. Given that police patrol vehicle doors cannot be opened from the inside, how did Brianna "fall" out of the car after kicking through the door?

Marvin Grier said, "I would do what any other parent would do, and that's what we're trying to do: find answers."

"If she exited the vehicle, they had to let her out." "In a police cruiser, you cannot unlock the door from the inside, therefore it must have been from the outside," Mary Grier said last week.

This week would confirm Mary's assertion to be correct. Brianna never kicked the door open since the door was never shut. WMAZ has reported:

According to the GBI, Grier was put in the rear of the vehicle while shackled in the front without a seatbelt. The inquiry indicated that once she was apprehended, they attempted to place her in the driver-side rear seat of the deputy's automobile.

One of the deputies circled the vehicle and opened the back passenger door. The officer returned to the driver's side. Both deputies placed Grier in the rear seat and closed the driver-side rear door.

The cops fled the area after the deputy believed he had closed the rear passenger side door and the deputies departed the scene. They travelled a short way before Grier jumped off the speeding vehicle. The deputies had no interaction with Grier from the moment she was placed in the automobile until she tumbled out of the vehicle, as seen by body camera video.

Whether due to ineptitude or malice, the deputies who took up Brianna that night have shattered a family. The two daughters of Brianna will now grow up without their mother.

As the tragic tragedy in Uvalde has shown, police have no obligation to protect you, as established in Warren v. District of Columbia. However, it has been expressly established that while you are in police custody, they are responsible for your protection.

In DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social Services (109 S.Ct. 998, 1989; 489 U.S. 189 (1989)), the court held that no duty arose as a result of a "special relationship," concluding that constitutional duties of care and protection only exist with respect to certain individuals, such as incarcerated prisoners, involuntarily committed mental patients, and others restrained against their will and thus unable to protect themselves.

Brianna met these requirements, yet her life was disgracefully discarded, and Georgia taxpayers will be held culpable.

Link on rumble:

Cop Jumps on Unarmed Man's Back and Shoots Him in the Head Over Laundry Detergent

This week, a horrifying video of a police-involved shooting was released, showing Harris County Sheriff's Office Sergeant Garrett Hardin crawling over the back of Roderick Brooks and shooting him in the back of the head. Brooks was accused of stealing detergent from a Dollar General store nearby. When he was slain, he was unarmed.

The cops reportedly got a complaint about a guy who allegedly shoplifted and shoved the store clerk on his way out.

The lady from the business phoned the police to report that a melanin male wearing a blue shirt, grey shorts, and a baseball cap had stolen merchandise and assaulted her on the way out.

During her 911 call, the lady said, "A client is fleeing out of the shop and he struck me on the way out." My arm was pushed out of the way by him.

The woman informed authorities that she was not wounded and did not require medical treatment.

She informed officers, "I just want him arrested because he is actually racing to the rear of the building right now," adding that she did not believe he was under the influence of drugs and that he was unarmed.

The dispatcher then asked the lady whether the responding cops would encounter any threats while confronting the guy, to which she responded, "No."

A second witness called 911 and said that the black guy had stolen laundry detergent and pushed the lady as he left.

As Hardin arrived on the scene, his body camera began recording. When Hardin exits his vehicle, he momentarily pursues Brooks before tasing him and forcing him to tumble to the ground.

Brooks is perplexed as to why the cop is on top of him and tries to get up.

"Why did you tase me?" Brooks asks Hardin. Please leave me alone, dude.

Brooks then makes the foolish choice of grabbing the taser that Hardin had placed on the ground in front of him.

"I plan on shooting you." Put it in writing, "Hardin urges." "I will f***ing shoot you," he said.

Brooks never pointed the taser at the officer, and by the time Hardin drew his gun, Brooks had already dropped it. Hardin positioned his handgun at the base of Brooks' skull and neck and fired a cartridge, immediately killing Brooks.

"Our results from a persistent absence of honest police in this nation. "It is a total disaster," attorney Justin Moore, who represents Brooks' family, told HuffPost. "Roderick would still be alive if it weren't for the renegade police roaming these streets."

Moore continued, "What we observed on raw camera indicates the officer was completely out of control and did not adhere to rules."

Moore claimed that Brooks was never a danger and was only defending himself while he briefly held the taser.

"The Taser problem is a red herring, and if you watch the video, you'll see that he takes the Taser but repeatedly releases it," Moore said. "He never seizes the weapon and aims it towards the officer." He attempted to stop it from electrocuting him.

After killing Brooks, Hardin was placed on administrative leave with pay while the department conducted its formal investigation.

The family of Brooks is now requesting that the Texas Rangers and US Department of Justice investigate. Demetria Brooks-Glaze, Brooks' sister, told the Huffington Post that witnesses observed Hardin repeatedly hitting Brooks, which explains why he was struggling, but this was not captured on the body camera film.

"The world must see their actions." "In this instance, they are withholding information," she stated, describing the shooting as "racist."

"What gives you the right to shoot someone in the back of the head and neck and take their life?" Brooks-Glaze added.

Warning: the video below contains graphic content.

Link on rumble:

Link on IG:

Link on youtube:

Body cam shows cop shooting unarmed 13-year-old with hands up, paralysing him

Another unarmed 13-year-old was shot by a Chicago police officer. The boy's hands were up; he posed no danger, and he was only a passenger in a car that was suspected of being stolen. Since that day, more than two months have passed, and we have recently heard that the officer who shot the youngster did not activate his body camera. However, a nearby officer had his camera on and recorded the shooting on film.

One week after their son was shot, the boy's parents filed a lawsuit against the city and the Chicago police department, alleging that the agency has been too tardy in enacting changes to address CPD's "long sordid history of employing excessive force." As evidence, their son's paralysis after a shooting

"This little boy's life has been irrevocably altered," said the family's attorney, Andrew M. Stroth. This energetic little child is struggling to regain his ability to walk.

Since he was shot on May 18, the youngster, known only as A.G. in the complaint, has been hospitalised. According to the complaint, the bullet struck him in the spine and left him with "permanent and catastrophic" injuries.

According to the complaint, A.G. was fleeing the gunman; he was unarmed; he presented no danger to the officer who shot him or anybody else in the area. "Multiple witnesses at the scene testified that A.G. obeyed the officers' instruction to raise his hands, and his hands were definitely up when John Doe Officer shot him,"

This officer, labelled as John Doe, has been recognised as Noah Ball. Additionally, it has come to light that Ball did not activate his camera until after he shot the youngster.

According to the police, they were investigating a suspected carjacker driving a stolen vehicle. The toddler was not the driver, but when police stopped the car, he leapt from the backseat and fled. He was never formally accused of a crime.

Chicago police said in a statement that at 10:15 p.m., officers were trying to "intercept a stolen car sought in connection with a vehicle hijacking from a nearby suburb" in the 800 block of North Cicero Avenue.

Police would say that when the toddler ran away, he "turned toward cops" for a moment before one of them opened fire and killed the helpless child. The youngster stopped, but he raised his hands in the air and had them up when the officer opened fire.

"All of a sudden, I saw a little man dressed in all black exit the vehicle and dash toward the petrol station with his hands up," an unidentified witness told ABC7.

"And I saw the officer approach the youngster and begin firing." "He had no weapon whatsoever," the witness said.

"They said, 'Raise your hands, raise your hands!'" The child's hands were raised. There are others who have seen it. It was everything on my phone, and his hands were raised. "He was unarmed," the witness said. They shot him without justification.

Tim M. Grace, an attorney for Ball, said that his client was right to kill the boy because the boy "aimed" his phone at the police officer.

"Police officers must make split-second choices, and the law not only recognises but also permits this." "Illinois law instructs us not to evaluate these situations with 20/20 hindsight, but rather from the perspective of a reasonable law enforcement officer," he told ABC 7.

Officer Ball can be heard shouting that he has a gun. Ball believed that the pointed object was a firearm. "The dark object in his hand that he pointed at the officers was actually a large cell phone," Grace wrote.

Officer Ball had no cover or concealment, so he had to make a split-second decision. He fired his service weapon to eliminate the danger.

However, there was no danger.

"The police were not required to shoot him. "If he got out of the car running and he wasn’t a threat, they didn’t have to shoot him," said a neighbour in her 70s who lives a block from the gas station. I'm so sad. He is only 13 years old... they lack guidance. "

Below is the first video captured by the gas station's surveillance camera. It shows multiple officers chasing after A.G. before he’s shot and collapses.

Link on rumble:

Unmarked car pulls up, cops get out with guns, execute him as he runs

This week, the parents of 23-year-old Robert Marquise Adams demanded answers and responsibility when a video captured two unmarked police vehicles pulling up to a parking lot and executing their son. It seems from the footage that Adams posed no danger to the cops and may not have even realised they were police.

On Monday, San Bernardino Police Chief Darren Goodman said in a video statement that police responded to a report of an armed black male in the parking lot of a company. According to investigators, Adams worked at the firm as an unauthorised security guard.

According to police, as they came up in their undercover car, Adams started approaching them. Adams was startled and turned to flee as they leapt out of the car. Adams would be dead within 15 seconds of the police's arrival.

As seen by the footage, Adams was conversing with a companion before the unmarked police vehicle arrived. According to Adams' mother, Tamika Deavila King, Adams was celebrating his friend's new automobile.

"He recently bought a new automobile, and they have identical BMWs," King told reporters.

Adams would have reason to move toward the unmarked automobile if he was employed as an unlicensed security guard by the corporation. In addition, it would make sense for him to run without a licence.

Police said that they had no choice but to kill Adams because he was holding a gun.

"The cops left their car and issued Adams verbal directions, but he quickly raced with the rifle in his right hand toward two parked automobiles." Adams was momentarily pursued by officers, but when they saw he had no escape route, they feared he meant to use the cars as cover to fire at them," Goodman said.

"Because one of the policemen feared for the safety of onlookers or himself, he fired his weapon, hitting Adams."

Even if he was carrying a gun, he never aimed it at anybody, and having a gun is not a crime punishable by death immediately. In addition, family counsel representing Adams claims he was carrying a smartphone, not a pistol, and was speaking with his mother at the time.

"You can see my child dancing because he was unaware of what was happening; he was dancing." After that, I was on the phone, and all I could hear were gunshots. He never told me goodbye. He never said goodbye to me, "Tamika King claimed."

"She heard the firing, she heard the quick series of rounds, and then she never heard her son's voice again," attorney Ben Crump said to reporters, contradicting the police story.

"Hey dude, you're going to be OK." "Are you with me?" The cop is heard stating this after putting holes in Adams. Adams did not fare well and passed away in the parking lot.

Lawyers for Adams's family don't agree with the police that a still photo shows Adams holding a gun.

"This individual was fleeing and was shot many times in the back," Chris O'Neal, another attorney for the family, said, noting that Adams was clutching a smartphone and not a pistol. He was not afforded the decency and civility of prompt emergency medical assistance.

The Adams family is now requesting that the officer who murdered their son be charged with murder.

The victim's stepfather, Audwin King, said, "The youngster fled." "[The officer] pursued him as if he were a dog." If [Adams] still had life in him, [the officer] would have likely completed the clip. So, when will it be rectified? "

"We want justice. We need his badge. We want his job, "remarked Audwin. "We want murder charges."

The video link below contains highly graphic content.

In Anambra, three people were killed as they clashed with the police.

  Over the weekend, the situation in the Aguleri village, which is located in the Anambra East Local Government Area of the state of Anambra...